Amid the turbulent fluctuations in cryptocurrency prices, the recent targeting of a particular digital currency and the scrutiny faced by another project due to extravagant team expenses have captured the attention of investors. Speculation is rife that these occurrences might deter investors from engaging with such projects.
Bittensor (TAO)
The Bittensor blockchain, which had made a significant mark in recent times, was subjected to an attack on July 3. Malefactors managed to siphon off more than $8 million worth of TAO tokens from users’ wallets. In response, all transactions were promptly halted to mitigate further losses. The core developers of Bittensor reassured users that measures would be put in place to avert similar incidents going forward. To investigate the root cause of the attack, the chain was momentarily paused and shifted into “safe mode.”
The decision taken by the team stirred concerns over centralization within the cryptocurrency realm, a domain that prides itself on decentralization, sparking considerable discontent. Additionally, the incident underscored underlying trust issues with the project, visibly perturbing investors. Consequently, apprehensions of potential future losses might discourage investors from engaging with TAO, potentially resulting in a market downturn.
Social media activity continues to buzz with discussions around Bittensor. Statistics indicated that 48.78% of individuals engaging with Bittensor expressed negative sentiments. This development holds the potential to incite panic selling and drive down prices.
Polkadot (DOT)
Meanwhile, the spotlight shifted to Polkadot. Recent criticisms aimed at the company have triggered concerns regarding its financial stability. Reports surfaced indicating that a staggering $87 million was disbursed in the first half of 2024 alone. Notably, 42% of these expenditures were earmarked for social initiatives, such as partnerships with influencers and sponsorships.
Furthermore, Polkadot’s treasury income witnessed a drastic decline, plummeting from 414,291 DOT tokens to 171,696 DOT. Key personnel within the company presented conflicting views on the financial landscape, with Tommi Enenkel suggesting a two-year spending buffer and CEO Fabian Gompf asserting that there was no imminent fund shortage.
The company came under fire for extravagant expenses, including a $53,000 budget allocation for an animated logo intended to be valid for six months. Such extravagant outlays are speculated to pose a significant challenge to the company’s sustainability.
In light of these developments, concerns surrounding negative feedback and a bleak financial prognosis for DOT could potentially influence its market value, potentially leading to a short-term downturn.
For the latest updates, you can track our news on Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, and Coinmarketcap.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article does not serve as investment advice. Investors are advised to recognize the high volatility and associated risks of cryptocurrencies and conduct thorough research before making investment decisions.
