The U.S. government executed two significant cryptocurrency transfers just before midnight on March 27.
These transactions involved the largest altcoin, Ethereum (ETH) 
$1,992, and the leading cryptocurrency, Bitcoin (BTC) 
$86,556, with a total value exceeding $10 million. Arkham Intelligence identified these transfers through on-chain data. Notably, a preliminary test transfer before the Ethereum transaction indicated a strategic and controlled approach to handling large sums. This event raised questions about the government’s repositioning of seized cryptocurrencies.
Ethereum Transfer Followed by a Test Transaction
A well-known wallet associated with the U.S. government, “Sae-Heng Seized Funds,” made a minor test transfer shortly before the main transaction. Initially, the wallet sent ETH worth just $1 to the address 0xBf7fb784C741482cf4801016E967c6e68f10c74b. Approximately ten minutes later, a more substantial transfer occurred, moving around $1.77 million in ETH to the same address. 
U.S. Government Ethereum Transfer
Such test transactions typically verify the recipient address’s accuracy before conducting large transfers. The “Sae-Heng” address is known to store cryptocurrencies seized from various illegal activities. Analysts interpreted this transfer as part of the government’s strategy to redirect its ETH holdings to new wallets. Moreover, the absence of further activity in the recipient wallet immediately after the transfer suggests that the funds are not intended for immediate sale. Nonetheless, it’s crucial to remember that large-scale transactions can still have short-term market impacts.
Bitcoin Transfer Followed Ethereum Transaction by Just 29 Minutes
Just 29 minutes after the Ethereum transfer, another government wallet initiated a Bitcoin transaction. According to data provided by Arkham Intelligence, the wallet transferred a total of 97,336 BTC, valued at approximately $8.46 million at current prices, to a new address starting with “bc1q7q…”. 
U.S. Government Bitcoin Transfer
Transactions of this magnitude are usually interpreted as preparatory moves before sales. However, Donald Trump’s prior and current efforts involving cryptocurrencies suggest that such intentions might be unlikely. As of now, there has been no further activity in the wallet where the BTC was sent.
